Skip to main content

Overview

A Customer Wiki Agent powered by Pylar automatically generates and maintains a comprehensive knowledge base by analyzing support tickets, customer interactions, product documentation, and frequently asked questions.

What the Agent Needs to Accomplish

The agent must:
  • Analyze support tickets and customer interactions to identify common questions
  • Extract key information from product documentation and manuals
  • Generate and update knowledge base articles
  • Answer FAQs using existing knowledge base
  • Identify knowledge gaps and suggest new articles
  • Track article effectiveness and update recommendations

How Pylar Helps

Pylar enables the agent by:
  • Unified Data Access: Combining support tickets, product docs, and knowledge base in one view
  • Pattern Recognition: Analyzing ticket patterns to identify common issues
  • Content Analysis: Querying product documentation and existing articles
  • Real-time Updates: Keeping knowledge base current with latest interactions
  • Governed Access: Ensuring only appropriate content is accessible

Without Pylar vs With Pylar

Without Pylar

Challenges:
  • ❌ Multiple systems to query (Zendesk, Confluence, Notion, product docs)
  • ❌ Complex API integrations for each system
  • ❌ Manual analysis of ticket patterns
  • ❌ Difficult to correlate support data with product documentation
  • ❌ No unified view of knowledge gaps
  • ❌ Time-consuming content updates
  • ❌ Limited ability to track article effectiveness
Implementation Complexity:
  • 3-4 different API integrations
  • Custom analytics for ticket patterns
  • Manual content curation
  • Complex data correlation logic
  • ~3-4 weeks development time

With Pylar

Benefits:
  • ✅ Single endpoint for all knowledge sources
  • ✅ SQL views combine tickets, docs, and articles
  • ✅ Easy pattern analysis through SQL queries
  • ✅ Real-time knowledge base updates
  • ✅ Built-in analytics on article effectiveness
  • ✅ Simple content updates via view modifications
Implementation Complexity:
  • Connect 3-4 data sources (1 hour)
  • Create knowledge base views (2 hours)
  • Build MCP tools with AI (1 hour)
  • Connect to agent builder (15 minutes)
  • Total: ~4-5 hours

Step-by-Step Implementation

Step 1: Connect Data Sources

Connect your knowledge sources:
  1. Connect Zendesk (Support tickets, articles)
  2. Connect Confluence/Notion (Product documentation)
  3. Connect Product Analytics (Feature usage, user behavior)
  4. Connect Knowledge Base (Existing articles, FAQs)

Step 2: Create Knowledge Base Views

Support Ticket Patterns View:
Knowledge Gap Analysis View:
Article Effectiveness View:

Step 3: Create MCP Tools with AI

Tool 1: Identify Knowledge Gaps
  • Prompt: “Create a tool to find topics with many support tickets but no knowledge base articles”
  • AI generates: find_knowledge_gaps(min_tickets: number, days_back: number)
Tool 2: Generate Article Suggestions
  • Prompt: “Create a tool to suggest new knowledge base articles based on support ticket patterns”
  • AI generates: suggest_articles(category: string, min_frequency: number)
Tool 3: Analyze Article Effectiveness
  • Prompt: “Create a tool to analyze how well articles are reducing support tickets”
  • AI generates: analyze_article_effectiveness(article_id: string, days_back: number)
Tool 4: Search Knowledge Base
  • Prompt: “Create a tool to search knowledge base articles and product documentation”
  • AI generates: search_knowledge_base(query: string, category: string)
Tool 5: Get FAQ Answers
  • Prompt: “Create a tool to retrieve FAQ answers from knowledge base”
  • AI generates: get_faq_answer(question: string)

Step 4: Test and Publish

  1. Test each tool with sample queries
  2. Verify knowledge gap identification
  3. Validate article suggestions
  4. Publish tools
  5. Connect to agent builder

Example Agent Interactions

Scenario 1: Knowledge Gap Identification

User: “What topics should we create articles for?” Agent (using Pylar tools):
  1. Calls find_knowledge_gaps(5, 90) - finds topics with 5+ tickets in last 90 days
  2. Analyzes results and responds:
    • “I found 12 topics that need articles:
      1. ‘Password Reset Issues’ - 23 tickets, avg resolution 2.5 hours
      2. ‘Payment Processing Errors’ - 18 tickets, avg resolution 4.2 hours
      3. …”

Scenario 2: FAQ Answering

User: “How do I reset my password?” Agent (using Pylar tools):
  1. Calls search_knowledge_base("password reset", null)
  2. Finds relevant article
  3. Responds: “To reset your password: 1. Go to login page, 2. Click ‘Forgot Password’, 3. Enter your email, 4. Check your inbox for reset link…”

Scenario 3: Article Effectiveness Analysis

User: “Which articles are most effective?” Agent (using Pylar tools):
  1. Calls analyze_article_effectiveness(null, 30)
  2. Analyzes results:
    • “Top performing articles: ‘Account Setup Guide’ has 0.5% ticket-to-view ratio, ‘Billing FAQ’ has 0.8% ratio…”

Outcomes

Knowledge Base Quality

  • Article Coverage: 40% increase in topics covered
  • Article Effectiveness: 35% reduction in related support tickets
  • Update Frequency: 3x faster article updates
  • Content Relevance: 50% improvement in article relevance scores

Support Efficiency

  • Self-Service Rate: 60% of common questions answered via knowledge base
  • Ticket Reduction: 25% reduction in support tickets
  • Resolution Time: 30% faster resolution for topics with articles
  • Agent Productivity: More time for complex issues

Data-Driven Insights

  • Gap Identification: Automated identification of knowledge gaps
  • Content Strategy: Data-driven article prioritization
  • Effectiveness Tracking: Continuous monitoring of article performance
  • Trend Analysis: Identification of emerging support patterns

Best Practices

  1. Regular Updates: Schedule weekly knowledge gap analysis
  2. Content Quality: Review and update articles based on effectiveness metrics
  3. User Feedback: Incorporate user feedback into article improvements
  4. Categorization: Maintain clear article categories for better search
  5. Analytics: Use Evals to track agent knowledge base usage patterns

Next Steps