Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.pylar.ai/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
Overview
An Expense Auditor powered by Pylar reviews expenses, identifies anomalies, ensures policy compliance, and generates audit reports to maintain financial integrity.What the Agent Needs to Accomplish
The agent must:- Review expense submissions
- Identify anomalies and outliers
- Check policy compliance
- Generate audit reports
- Track approval workflows
- Identify fraud patterns
How Pylar Helps
Pylar enables the agent by:- Unified Expense View: Combining expenses, policies, and approvals
- Anomaly Detection: Automated anomaly identification
- Compliance Checking: Policy compliance validation
- Audit Reporting: Automated audit report generation
Without Pylar vs With Pylar
Without Pylar
Challenges:- ❌ Manual expense review
- ❌ Time-consuming anomaly detection
- ❌ Complex compliance checking
- ❌ Limited audit capabilities
With Pylar
Benefits:- ✅ Automated expense review
- ✅ Real-time anomaly detection
- ✅ Policy compliance automation
- ✅ Efficient audit reporting
Step-by-Step Implementation
Step 1: Connect Data Sources
- Connect Expense System (Expense reports, receipts)
- Connect HR System (Employee data, policies)
- Connect Approval System (Approvals, workflows)
Step 2: Create Expense Views
Expense Anomaly View:Step 3: Create MCP Tools
Tool 1: Review Expensereview_expense(expense_id: string)
identify_anomalies(days_back: number, min_amount: number)
check_compliance(expense_id: string, policy_version: string)
generate_audit_report(period: string, include_anomalies: boolean)
Example Agent Interactions
User: “Review expenses for potential fraud” Agent: “Expense Audit Results:- Total Expenses: $125K
- Anomalies Found: 12
- High Risk: 3 expenses ($15K total)
- Employee #456: 500)
- Employee #789: $5K travel (no receipts)
- Employee #123: $2K duplicate submission
- Recommendation: Flag for manual review”
Outcomes
- Review Speed: 85% faster
- Anomaly Detection: 90% accuracy
- Compliance: 95% policy compliance
- Fraud Detection: 60% earlier detection